NPDL Spring Winners and Building Parli Teams!

Congratulations to Nueva’s Ritika Savla & Eliya Wee for winning NPDL Spring in the Open Division, on a 3-2 decision on the resolution, “When in conflict, governments should prioritize mitigating existential risks (i.e. nuclear war, climate change) over reducing suffering in humans and animals.” Menlo-Atherton HS (Allegra Hoddie & Gustav Singel) were runners-up.

Congratulations as well to Princeton High Schools’s Hu & Wang for winning the March Columbia University Parli Invitational on a 4-0 decision!

-Nate Berls, NPDL Curriculum Director

Image courtesy of Mary Institute and Saint Louis Country Day School

How I Built a Thriving Parli Team From Scratch—And How You Can Too

Ethan Bordoff, junior at Hunter College High School, NPDL Correspondent

Three days and three rounds. That was the extent of my parliamentary debate experience when I entered my sophomore year as founder and head of my school’s parli team. I felt vastly unprepared, learning as I taught. Practice attendance was low, tournament attendance even lower, and almost nobody outside of our team even knew parli existed. This year, I did almost everything differently, and the changes we made have been a huge step in the right direction. I’ve also taken on a role as a member of the New York Parliamentary Debate League’s (NYPDL) Onboarding Committee, where I help students and coaches make the right choices for their teams. In this article, I’ll share the five most important pieces of advice I give to those looking to start or expand a parli team, the tips I wish I’d gotten before I started my team. While every team’s journey is unique, these tips are essential for building a strong foundation.

1. Advertise, Advertise, Advertise

I cannot stress this enough. Every high school has dozens of extracurriculars to join, and you are competing against them. Luckily, parli sells itself. It’s an academic extracurricular, it’s popular in college, and team members get to discuss almost every topic imaginable—including many less-than-serious ones—and there’s no required work outside of practices and tournaments. (That said, a major error is to characterize parli as a low-commitment, unserious extracurricular. I did that my first year, and though it got some people to come, by the end of the year I hadn’t seen many of them at practice for months.)

At the start of the year, before you hold any interest meetings, make sure that students have heard of parli and will attend: Hang posters advertising what parli has to offer, start an Instagram account and follow students at your school, spread the word through friends, have food at the meeting, ask your faculty advisor or a favorite teacher to advertise the team to their class (a teacher with six classes and thirty students per class can advertise to almost two hundred students in a single day). Even if nobody really knows what parli is beforehand, you can use this interest meeting to hook them. It’s crucial to do this as early as possible, since many students (myself included) are hesitant to join new extracurriculars later in the year.

Once the meeting has passed, keep advertising. Keep those posters up, share photos on Instagram of your team having fun at practice or tournaments, tell members to advertise parli to their friends, and make it explicitly clear that meetings will have donuts (this last one works much better than you might think). Hopefully, you should have a decent amount of returning members.

2. Utilize Free Resources

One of the reasons that I love parli so much is that despite the fact that it’s competitive, it has one of the nicest and most helpful communities that I’ve been a part of. Resources from leagues such as the NPDL or NYPDL are on the leagues’ websites, and they have slideshows covering a variety of lesson plans that you can use to guide your practices. I’ve personally used NPDL and NYPDL resources almost exclusively to teach my team, and they’ve saved countless hours in planning and ensured my team had access to high quality instructional material.

To gain experience before the year starts, opportunities like summer camps or mentorship programs are a great path to take. Camps give you the experience you need in a short time frame, and mentors can meet with you throughout the year to help address problems that arise with your team and give you advice. To get you started, the NYPDL runs a free, virtual, summer camp each year and has a free mentorship program open to all; you can find links to both on their website.

3. Make Practice Engaging

Make sure you know the material you’re presenting. You don’t have to be an expert on it, but for example, if you followed item two and are using outside slideshows, make sure you’ve read through them, can present them without reading from the slides, and are prepared to answer questions. From experience, team members immediately disengage when you’re trying to understand each slide as you present it. They can tell!

Next, make sure that lessons aren’t just lectures. Do drills after a slideshow and make sure to ask for examples as you go along. Since your team members know you might ask for their input or ask them to try skills themselves, they will be much more engaged. Collaborative drills (for example, creating refutations to a case together on the day that you cover how to respond to arguments) take the pressure off of individual students, allow you to guide your team members with hints, and encourage teamwork with students building off of each other.

However, ensure that you also give your team members ample chances to just debate. I hold practice four days a week and have found that alternating between practice rounds and lessons works well. Not only does this make practices fun, but it takes the lessons from abstract to useful by allowing students to implement what they learned. Having motions related to what you taught in the previous lesson (such as economics or politics) is a great way to encourage that. Practice rounds also help team members build up confidence to compete.

Lastly, one of my favorite parts about parli is that as far as academic extracurriculars go, it’s really fun. Use that to your advantage in meetings. Use pop culture motions as for drills, read funny contentions for your team to respond to or weigh against, let team members choose which motions they want to debate, or even add jokes into your slideshows. I find that team members stay the longest and are the most engaged when we’re still learning but not taking everything too seriously (just make sure that you can still get serious when you need to be). The last part of running your team to focus on is tournaments…

4. Compete as Soon and as Often as Possible

The best way to learn is to compete. Tournaments are fun, and tournament success is a great way to improve the legitimacy of parli within your school. (Make sure to share your accomplishments and maybe some fun photos through social media, emails, or your school’s announcements system, if it has one.)Many novices are reluctant to compete, especially early in the season. I find that it’s a combination of not thinking that they will do well, and tournaments being a hassle in terms of travel, judging, and time commitment.

If novices are worried about how they will perform at their first competition, look for tournaments with split novice and varsity divisions. This will ensure that your teams don’t have a bad experience against experienced debaters, and their rounds are as evenly matched. Most West Coast tournaments have these, and since it’s novice, even if you’re on the East Coast it's unlikely that your teams would run into advanced progressive arguments (Ks or Theory). However, some East Coast tournaments also have split divisions, usually those run by colleges (such as Brown or Columbia’s annual tournaments). However, if tournaments with only one division, such as those run by the NYPDL, work best, that shouldn’t be a dealbreaker—just make sure to remind them that these tournaments are harder, but are the best way to improve. Next, let your team members know why they should compete early on. This is their only novice year, so they should make the most of the easier opponents and path to elimination rounds, and early on in the year, all novices have the same amount of experience. The longer they wait to compete, the more they risk falling behind. Lastly, if you as a competitor have performed poorly at a tournament (especially your first one), letting your novices know that can be strangely relieving. They likely look up to you as a standard for a “good debater,” and the fact that you don’t always do well takes a lot of pressure off of them to succeed right away.

If tournaments are expensive or far away, see if you can get your school or the tournament organizers to waive the fees of those for whom these fees would be a barrier to entry, and try to organize carpools or groups to take public transportation together. Online tournaments can also be a great way to avoid these issues, as they’re often cheaper than in-person ones. Some are even free: the NYPDL runs free online tournaments monthly. If there is a parli organization in your area that runs shorter tournaments (such as the Connecticut Debate Association or Golden Gate Speech Association’s four-round tournaments), these can be great first tournaments for your novices, before they know that they’re willing to devote a whole weekend to parli. Additionally, trying to encourage your teams to all go to a specific tournament is a great strategy, since it makes the experience more social and fun. Having a team dinner or ice cream run after an in-person tournament helps create the lasting friendships that strong teams are built on. For online tournaments, try creating a group chat for competitors instead.

5. Be Patient And Celebrate Success

Even if you’re doing everything right, building a successful team takes time. There will be practices when nobody shows up, and tournaments where every team does badly. Celebrate your wins: it doesn’t matter if a school had eight teams break, you can be just as happy that your first team ever broke. Remember what your team looked like (if it existed) before you started running it, and think about how far you’ve come; your novices who made it to elimination rounds learned everything they know about parli from you. If you’re a junior or senior, consider thinking, later in the year, about who you might want to run the team once you graduate. Make sure that you find someone who you’re confident can continue what you started, and maybe even have them co-captain with you for a year to give them the necessary experience if you can.

Two years in, I still have days when I wait for half an hour only for nobody to show up to practice and weeks where only one team comes. But I also have days where nearly the whole team is present and weeks where I see almost every partnership. My team hasn’t won the TOC or swept states (yet!), but I’m happy with the progress that we’ve made. I hope, just maybe, in a few years, new captains will be aiming to reach the heights of the very best teams—perhaps even yours.

Ethan Bordoff is a junior at Hunter College High School in NYC, serves on Onboarding and Outreach Committee of the NYPDL Board, founder and captain of Hunter’s parli team, and National Parliamentary Debate League Correspondent.

Tournament Results And College Debate Interviews

Tournament Results

This weekend, Parli debaters competed at Stanford and Brown University tournaments. Congratulations to Dublin’s Harveer Saini and Suhani Gupta for winning the 39th Stanford invitational in the TOC Qualifying division.

Congratulations to Horace Mann’s Michelle Grinberg & Ian Allard-Neptune for winning the open division of the first annual Brown University Invitational. I had the pleasure of judging at the Brown tournament and it was a fantastic experience. A notable topic: THBT horizontal mergers should be heavily restricted. Certainly a brain-bender!

- Nate Berls, NPDL Curriculum Director

As a High School Debater, Should You Compete in College?

Kevin Chen, junior at the Nueva School, NPDL Correspondent 

Although in most people’s minds “competitive debate” conjures up images of high school students giving podium speeches to their peers during club hours or forcing their parents to drive them to weekend tournaments at dawn, debate can be just as big a part of collegiate life as in high school. This rings especially true for parliamentary debate, as the often localized event is suddenly expanded to a truly national scale with more than 300 participating schools. APDA and NPDA (American and National Parliamentary Debate Association, respectively) make up the core of college parli, with several thousand active debaters. The NPDA is the larger of the two leagues, with stylistic features similar to high school NPDL debate.

I asked three college debaters their thoughts. Timothy Zhu is a third year at UC Berkeley and a coach for the Nueva debate team, Brenna Seiersen is a graduate student at UC Berkeley who coaches the Cal college parli team and Campolindo team, and Rohan Sachdev is a second year at University of Chicago who coaches for the Nueva school.


Tell me a bit about the type of debate you do.

Rohan: I do American Parliamentary Debate. It is similar to what you are used to; the main difference is the way that topics are decided. One [type] is motions: we are given a topic and assigned a side of that topic. The other is called cases debate: the team assigned to Gov gets the opportunity to decide on a topic, and they have a predefined PMC written ahead of time, whereas the other team has to spend the 15 minutes prepping.

Brenna: The [only stylistic] difference between college and high school debate is that NPDA allows team prep. The debates, especially at the university level, are quite technical. These debates are going to be very, very fast, with critical arguments and theory. Even when they talk about policy, they’re going to have interesting arguments. I also have insight into community college NPDA, which is stylistically different [from university]. In terms of style, it’s slower, with emphasis on presentation. You don’t really have kritiks or theory, since many of your judges are speech coaches. Also, it’s definitely a mandate to wear suits, unlike university parli.

For APDA, who arbitrates the fairness of cases, since the affirmation can propose anything?

Rohan: There's a sort of an inbuilt theory mechanism to deal with this. It's called tight calling. The thesis is that if the Opp team believes that the Gov case is too strong, they can do what's called a tight call, which says “this isn't fair, we should switch sides,” Then the Opp defends the Gov case and vice versa.

What was your favorite pre-prepared APDA case?

Rohan: My favorite case to debate is about the IRA. In Irish history, at the end of British colonization, there was a guerrilla force fighting against their occupation during the Irish Civil War. At the end of the Irish Civil War, the treaty enshrines that Ireland exists as a free state, excluding approximately six northern counties which were to remain under control of the United Kingdom. There was a part of the IRA that decided that they wanted to continue fighting against the treaty. The case talks about the Irish Catholic Church's reaction to that, because they chose to excommunicate those people who continue to fight. [The case] considers their motivations, their interests, etc.

How much time do you spend preparing for debate in the average week?

Tim: Well during break before [tournaments], we did a round a day, about two hours. But in a normal season, we’re not that diligent about practicing.

Brenna: I probably do around two practice rounds a week, and spend time outside of that writing files or doing prep drills. Sometimes during class if a lecture was really boring, I just take out my computer and start writing files.

How is the tournament experience? Is it any different from high school tournaments?

Tim: They’re almost all travel tournaments. A couple, like University of the Pacific, were local. But we’ve flown to McKendree, UT Tyler… I’ve gone to three tournaments my freshman spring, one more recently, and two more this semester.

Rohan: The least committed members of the team will go once a quarter. The most committed members of the team, which I would say I'm probably one of, will aim to go two or three times a month. In terms of how the competing experience is different, I'm doing a lot more traveling. I'm taking at least a two hour flight most weekends and getting up usually at about four or five a.m. on a Friday morning, competing through Friday, competing through Saturday, and then [getting on] a morning flight back.

How does the circuit differ from the high school level?

Brenna: I know that pre COVID the circuit was quite tight knit as people were close friends with people from other teams, but you also had huge rivalries. I would say that now, friendships are more rare. Teams are more hesitant to socialize with other teams, but the experience is generally positive. We don't have a lot of drama on the circuit, more like friendly acquaintances.

Rohan: I would say a large proportion of people do high school debate because they want to get into college. In college, there really is no similar motivation. There's some networking benefits, but if you're getting up at 4 a.m. on a Friday morning to go to a tournament, odds are you care about debate more than checking a box, so everyone cares a lot more about debate at the college level.

How has debating in college shaped your social life?

Tim: The NPDA circuit is fairly small, so you see the same people very consistently, and you hit the same people at tournaments. If you're on the circuit for a while, you get a lot of opportunities to meet people from other schools. Everyone is so nice on the NPDA circuit nowadays.

Brenna: When I was in community college, I would say that my main friend group was my debate team. We had a really dedicated team room on the [Diablo Valley College] campus, so it was normal for most people on the team to always be there in between every class. Now that I'm at Berkeley, thankfully my social circle isn't just the debate team, but I'm still super close to my team. Because I mean we're traveling together quite often and we're cooped up in little hotel rooms or Airbnb's together.

Rohan: Some people come with predefined cases that they want to talk about, so some people know a lot about African IR, some people know a lot about random TV shows, etc. It really does create a diverse community of people that know a lot of random things and engage with their interests in good faith. We get very close when we're competing because we're having new experiences [when we’re] traveling.

Would you recommend doing college debate for a current high school debater?

Tim: Yeah. Debate for me has a massive skill ceiling, and the amount of knowledge you can gain is incredible. I would probably not do NPDA if you don’t care about winning. I feel like to participate in this competitive event, you need to know things to avoid losing instantly to something like one-off spectral politics. If you want to win, there’s a lot of ways you can improve—get faster, memorize positions to set yourself apart from other people on the circuit.

Brenna: Yes, absolutely. I think that people who have a background in high school debate often find a lot of success in college debate as well.

Rohan: I think it depends. There's a moment in your life where you feel like you're done with debate, and the returns start to diminish. The type of person who would like APDA is someone who has a very specific interest and wants to continue learning in a way that debate provides. The question is really: Does debate provide you with more value than whatever else you could be doing? The average person could learn a lot from APDA, but it’s up to the individual to decide if it’s worth their time.

Kevin Chen is a current parliamentary debater, junior at the Nueva School, and National Parliamentary Debate League Correspondent.

A guest post by

Kevin Chen

March Newsletter

March Newsletter

We are incredibly excited to invite you all to the NPDL National Tournament - an online high school parliamentary debate championship open to teams from across the US. The tournament is April 14-16. Please register by April 5.

On May 1-7 we will be electing the 2023-24 Board of Directors. If you are considering throwing your hat into the ring, make sure to email our Inspectors of Election at npdl.elections@gmail.com by April 5, 11:59PM (Pacific time).

Outside the Round: A'Dorian Murray Thomas

Outside the Round: A'Dorian Murray Thomas

Join the NPDL and A’Dorian Murray-Thomas on Wed, August 5th at 7PM PST/10PM EST in a discussion as she discusses her journey as a young change agent in the nonprofit and government worlds in Newark, NJ. Murray-Thomas is the youngest woman to sit on the Newark School Board and is the Founder of the nonprofit SHE Wins. Join on Zoom Meeting ID: 837 4096 2569 Passcode: 674437

Introducing: Outside the Round

Introducing: Outside the Round

Join the NPDL and Lorreen Pryor on Wed, July 29th at 7PM PST/10PM EST in a discussion as she tackles the tough topic of educational racism, including injustices in the academic climate and issues that are affecting the Black community. Her focus will be undoing the myths, informing those willing to listen, and providing action for willing allies.

Statement on Black Lives Matter

Dear Parliamentary Debate Community:

Racism and bigotry have been a stain on our nation since its founding. Though these issues are hardly new, we feel it is an outrage how our Black community has been treated. We mourn and are deeply saddened by the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery and too many others. We stand in solidarity with all communities harmed by the scourge of racism and bigotry.